I have a new article up at Tablet called “Is the Backlash to Universities Becoming Real?” I argue that a combination of Republicans waking up, a general souring on higher education among the public, and market competition are starting to have an impact. It begins thus:
In 2019, Ron DeSantis appointed Brian Lamb, a former point guard at the University of South Florida, to the 17-member board of regents for the state university system. The Florida governor when he made the pick was clearly thinking more about his athletic accomplishments than ideological principles, as Lamb soon afterwards became head of diversity and inclusion at JPMorgan Chase. It therefore probably shouldn’t have been surprising when, after the death of George Floyd, he sent a memo to all presidents of public colleges in Florida demanding they “prioritize and support diversity, racial and gender equity, and inclusion” and told them that they would be held “accountable for policies, programs, and actions” in this area.
Nonetheless, in May of last year, DeSantis signed a bill banning DEI across the state system. By January, the Board of Regents voted to implement that law. DeSantis was first, but since his DEI ban, eight other governors have signed similar bills. While the culture war has been part of American life since the 1960s, the last few years have been a turning point, with Republican politicians finally becoming willing to rein in university administrators.
For conservatives and moderates, it’s easy to be disillusioned by recent anti-Israel protests at universities across the country. For many of us, the moral outrage we feel towards open displays of sympathy for Hamas is tempered only by disgust towards college kids who are still masking outdoors and worried about potentially dying of banana allergies. But there are signs that this isn’t 2020 anymore. At the University of Texas, president Jay Hartzell has been roundly praised by Republican lawmakers for taking a tough stand towards protestors at the incipient stage of their activism. As one professor at the school told me, “They did the right thing. They didn't let us become Columbia or UCLA.” In Florida, DeSantis came out and threatened students with possible expulsion, which may have stopped much of a protest movement from getting off the ground in the first place. The president of the University of Chicago not only refused to let protestors take over campus, but denounced the entire idea of encampments as inherently coercive. And although not directly related to the protests, in the midst of these disturbances MIT became the first elite private school to ban DEI statements in faculty hiring and promotion, showing that the “Summer of Floyd” effect that once seemed to push all prestigious institutions in the same direction may be fading.
These are signs that changes are afoot. They’re not taking place at the same pace everywhere, and some departments, fields of study, and universities might be sinking deeper into a left-wing monoculture. Nonetheless, there is at least variation in how institutions are behaving, which appears to be the result of two processes. First, Republican politicians have actually started paying attention to what is going on at university campuses, and more importantly, become willing to do something about it. More subtly, at the same time there has been a great discrediting of higher education, particularly elite universities, and this inevitably affects the decisions of employers and potential students.
Read the whole thing over at Tablet and discuss here.
I'm an adjunct prof/lecturer in Canada and our universities - because they don't have involved alumni - (no sports programs to speak of) are better at staying out of the media glare. I have been suspended since Nov. 27 of last year for responding to a Pakistani 'academic' on LI and saying I stood with Israel and Hamas are Nazis. Unfortunately, I set off a very influencial Palestinian professor who is well connected to Guelph and Humber administration and has the V Provost signing a claim against me. His anti-semitism? He posts at least five times a day and his top hits are Jews are not human, exterminate Israel, Jews are satanists, Jews shot all their hostages, there are no tunnels in Gaza, genocide etc. The HRC against him was rejected, his against me has left me banned, banished, slandered, libeled by both faculty and staff, I have had no chance to offer a defence. Their investigator is another Jew hating zealot. Today, I received what seems to be the pre-sacking payout, a 14 year career finished. Yes, at the U of Guelph anti semitism is the baseline, saying you stand with Israel will get you a HRC and get you fired. Hamas University or the University of Guelph (they prefer the latter) is breaking new ground! There are far more Muslim students than Jewish at my Uni and the administration has granted them all anonymity to fire vitriol at me, admin have encouraged verbal attacks at me, they have surrendered to the mob and the few Jewish faculty and students have become very good and hiding avoiding attention. I am not officially canned but they stopped paying me, cancelled my courses, ended my benefits, and disabled all my passwords, I am not allowed to even look at my paystubs. The Jewish and Free Speech Community is not happy but they are keeping their powder dry until I am officially sacked. Then we will see. This is Canada.
https://www.freedomtoffend.com/p/to-the-chanting-boy-wearing-a-keffiyeh?r=iy2ds. https://www.freedomtoffend.com/p/i-am-being-thrown-in-the-slowly-grinding?lli=1
Hey, I'm in the UPenn encampment, and I've been reading your blog for a few months (came from ACX). I don't speak for anyone else in the encampment, but since I want to assume you wrote this in good faith, I have to note that some things you said are just not true:
- No one (reasonable) is concerned about COVID anymore. The masks are only to protect students' identities. Police and agitators continually shove phones and cameras into the encampment to identify faces, and some of us have had their entire family's background researched and published. Yes, there are some paranoid types at the encampment, because protesting is a honeypot for those kinds of people, and those people will wear masks. Very few do otherwise.
- Hamas committed unspeakable atrocities. I can't say that everyone in the camp will say this out of context, but I think people who won't should leave, and many of the people spouting the kinds of stupid shit that news networks pick up are not Penn students. Unfortunately, anti-Israel sentiment has always been a honeypot for antisemites, but let's shake hands: Republicans aren't racist simply because they're a honeypot for racists, and protesters aren't antisemites just because there's a common hot-button issue at the moment. (And let me reiterate that, statistically, an obscenely huge part of the encampment is Jewish.)
- Related to both of the points I've made so far, the protests are not "open displays of sympathy for Hamas." Again, let's shake hands: you're not a secret racist just because you occasionally mention IQ, and the encampments aren't secretly racist because they take issue with their tuition funding bombs that have so far killed 2% of an entire region's population(!) and counting(!). I'm not advocating for any particular solution; I'm there solely because wars should not involve this unimaginable level of suffering for innocent families, no matter how just the cause. (And if they must, I cannot consent to my tax dollars and tuition paying for it.) Personally, if the university simply disclosed whether they invest in anything directly related to selling weapons to Israel and committed to reducing those investments over some reasonable time, I'd leave, and (in my experience) many share a similar sentiment. Yes, there are unreasonable people who don't understand economics, but who cares? You're not arguing against them; trust me, you're smart, and your time is far too valuable for that. They're just clickbait. That's fine, but I respect you less every time I read a paragraph I expect to contain an informative point and get . . . this instead.
Last, let me note that this all relates to classic stuff that neoliberals have been dealing with since the dawn of time. Frédéric Bastiat said in 1845 that “the worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended.” What you're doing by reiterating these misleading accounts of (very hateable!) people, conflating them with the rest of us, does no one good. Additionally, if universities do crack down on peaceful protests, it sets a dangerous precedent for unconditional free speech, and I will defend unconditional free speech to the grave. (Incidentally, I was excited for leftists to wake up and start defending free speech again once establishments tried to silence discussion of Palestine, but unfortunately that hasn't happened yet.) I'm surprised that reasonable libertarians/neoconservatives are not outraged that their tax dollars are being used to fuel an unimaginably destructive and wasteful military campaign overseas, and I have to think that these unfavorable accounts of the "culture" of the encampments contribute to this distortion of reason. So go ahead, skewer these people who are admittedly very fun to skewer. But once that's been milked dry, there are some reasonable beliefs across the aisle. Not everyone in these encampments is insane.
P.S.: yes, this is a new account; sorry but I don't trust you all yet <3