Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alistair Penbroke's avatar

The problem is that finding an anti-woke positive message veers dangerously close to asking what the meaning of life is.

Wokeism smells like religion because it gives adherents an all encompassing, infinitely large mission that can absorb unlimited energies from unlimited people (at least, if you accept the axioms). It is a Meaning Of Life.

To compete with that you've got ... what? Going to Mars? Irrelevant to 99.999% of all people because Mars is cold and empty and they can't take part even if for some reason moving to an oxygen-free freezing desert sounded good. The Enlightenment Project? What does that even mean? National greatness? The best of a bad bunch but even so, it hardly means anything.

I felt for many years that at the root of a lot of social problems in our society is the realization that we're stuck here on Earth, that we explored the whole thing and that there's nowhere left to go. Why exactly are we here? What is it all for? What should we strive for? Very few politicians are willing to make a full throated pitch for technological utopianism, partly because that offers nothing to anyone who isn't a technologist and politicians rarely are. Traditionally Christianity offered answers, so discarding it has left a meaning-shaped hole that the culture war fills (but unfortunately, fills with bitterness).

Expand full comment
Sheluyang Peng's avatar

Good points. I do have two questions:

1) Why do you think that South Asians (like Vivek and also Bobby Jindal and Nikki Haley) seem to be more successful in American politics than East Asians, despite East Asians making up more of the population?

2) You say that social liberalism and economic conservatism are both high-status. Does that mean libertarians are the highest-status people? If so, why is the Libertarian Party not gaining much traction?

Expand full comment
108 more comments...

No posts