Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Anonymous's avatar

> (animal suffering BTW is something I take seriously enough that it could blow up this entire analysis, but I’ll bracket the topic for now and save it for another day)

Some societal issues are mostly or fully empirical. "What energy policy will lead to the most economic growth and reduction in human suffering?" "What form of government best accomplishes objectives X, Y, and Z?" etc. Answering these questions requires the qualities that ECs excel at: an open mind, intelligence, and seeing the world as it is (as opposed to what you would wish it to be). Also, contemporary thinkers have an advantage here, because there is more empirical information available in the present.

But some questions are far more moral than empirical. "What is the moral weight of animal suffering?" "What duties do we have to fellow citizens, and to foreigners?" "What freedoms should we treasure most? How do we judge compromises between preserving freedom and avoiding chaos?" "What is the moral worth of an unborn child's life?" "What causes are worth dying for, and when is it better to compromise?" No scientific experiment can answer these, and the EC toolset is mostly worthless here. ECs may sidestep many of these questions with libertarianism, or support economic progress as a way of papering over divisions. But sometimes there is no compromise option, and the can be kicked no further.

This is where the ancients come into their own. Jesus, Confucius, Socrates, Homer, Virgil, the Buddha, and St. Aquinas may be clueless about pandemic mitigation or tariff policy. But on what it means to live a good life, what values to cherish most, and what rhetoric and symbolism to use to support these views—they are infinitely superior to the modern "ethicists" and "communications" midwits.

Tanner Greer is such a great intellectual because he excels in both disciplines. He has the detachment necessary to properly judge empirical questions. But he also has read history and the classics, and has a clear moral vision of what is worth living for.

Expand full comment
Klaus's avatar

You touched on this a bit, but I would add that I like to read people is that people who write in plain language and use words in their standard meanings. I try to aim for this: my blog is called Simplify. Of the people from your list that I recognize, they all seem to write in a straightforward manner. They also avoid the non-standard word usage, where people say stuff like "eating sushi is colonialism" or whatever.

Expand full comment
156 more comments...

No posts